In-game name: Hunyo16
Discord ID: dqxn#0001
Ban Reason: Destroying the land next to a faction to make members not want to take care of it
Reason for pleading:
I believe the current reason that you’re banning me for is not right or not included in the rules given in the Server and Forums Rules
I misunderstood the word “appeal”, my apologies for sending it there . The defending part for Und3rline/K4nt_Hui13 and the second demand were because I wanted to defend for my friends and it is now irrelevant to this appeal so I’ve edited it.
I disagree with my ban’s reason
For my case: “Destroying the land next to a faction to make members not want to take care of it”
According to Rule 2, General In-Game Rules:
“Building in the wilderness is not allowed. Always claim before building. Mining/looting in Wilderness, however, is allowed.”
My action, did not violate any parts of the rule as it is only for “minorly” destroying the land which was wilderness at the same time as I placed down the first TNT.
And if you charged me with Rule 3, Behavior Rules if my first disagreement was admitted:
“Stealing from or griefing other players is not allowed.”
It would also be wrong because the place was and is wilderness. You can only charge me with this only if both King and I were in either AfterTime or BeforeTime.
Then if you accuse me with this reason:
despite the irritating and ugliness of the terrain that has always been griefed around the spawn area which no one has ever reported on or getting banned for griefing the area then my ban is unreasonable according to the situation.
I once messaged 32294 to check the logs of the griefs at the wilderness around our base, he(the griefer) was our member and still hasn’t got banned because of that.
The current ban on me would only work if Rule 2, General In-Game Rules was given a clearer description which could have been added:
"NOTICE: - “DESTROYING A LAND NEXT TO A FACTION WITH THE INTENTION OF GRIEFING IS NOT ALLOWED, THIS RELATES TO RULE #3 OF BEHAVIOR SECTION”
even you admitted it then banning me instead of warning which could have been a thing to give rules a fix
And if you accused me with this
after my disagreement was either conceded or refused and added up with another thing for my ban then it would be still unreasonable for because of my action was absolute and did not involve with the intention of going around the loopholes.
“To make sure it won’t get used anymore”
This line which you have probably accepted as the truth and decided to ban me because of that particular reason then the truth I told you is something to prove that this disagreement is absolute and did not involve with the last notice of Server and Forums Rules.
I have always followed the rules, I have always acted decent towards other players, spent all my time instead of studying just to take part in this community even after getting harassed over some ancient debris. And now you say:
It is just so unfair to me and favoured to some parties
- I am also not violating Rule 6, Rules of ban appeals, I am cooperating with you to get me unbanned out of the current reason and the reason that you have banned me for is wrong according to my disagreements above, therefore, I have the rights to tell whether it is wrong or not.